AVE, Still an Inaccurate Yardstick

Posted on February 11, 2010. Filed under: Public Relations, Social Media | Tags: , , , |

Recently I’ve received a few requests from clients to provide Ad Value Equivalency (AVE) metrics. AVE is widely criticized by our industry as inaccurate for numerous reasons, but the influx of social media, Twitter, blogs, message boards, Facebook etc. makes AVE even more inaccurate.

At Dow Jones, we do not recommend using AVE as a best practice or as a mediocre practice for that matter. The metric seeks to illustrate the value of a company’s mentions in the media by using the number of column inches the article uses and matching that to the cost to run an equivalent size ad in the same publication. This derives a dollar value for editorial space such as: if an article mentioning your company/product/brand in The Wall Street Journal is 2″ x 6″ and an equivalent advertisement in the WSJ costs $40K (made up number), then the article is worth $40K in AVE.

AVE is inaccurate in many ways, but mainly it fails because it seeks to show ROI on PR efforts by using an advertising yardstick.

Getting into the details, not all articles in the media are positive, and rarely are they as positive about a company as an advertisement would be. Would a company pay top dollar for a neutral or mildly favorable advertisement? Additionally, calculating column inches does not take factors such as placement, design elements such as font, page layout, photos etc. into account. Further, and perhaps most importantly it is difficult to predict how readers will react when they see an ad vs. when they see an article about a company or product.

Social media and non-advertising Web media add yet another reason against using AVE. If your company is seeking to gain exposure in a specific blog that does not advertise, or in product message boards or other non-advertising spaces online, mentions in those outlets would not count in the AVE model.  Add Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and other social media sites to the equation and the AVE metric falls further off of the wagon.

As a metric, AVE doesn’t hold water and it cannot effectively measure value of social media. Advertising costs are different from PR spend. I’ll post some alternative PR ROI methods for those seeking to assign dollar values to PR performance in my next post. Additionally, I’ll add a review of a recent paper “A New Paradigm for Media Analysis: Weighted Media Cost” by Angela Jeffrey, APR Vice President Editorial Research, VMS; Bruce Jeffries-Fox President, Jeffries-Fox Associates and Brad L. Rawlins, Ph.D. Chairman, Department of Communications Brigham Young University.

Matt Donahue is a media consultant based in Washington, D.C.

Advertisements

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

One Response to “AVE, Still an Inaccurate Yardstick”

RSS Feed for The Conversational Corporation Comments RSS Feed

Interestingly, many PR practitioners admit that PR has a bigger impact than advertising – and use that as a justification to work with multipliers (I’ve seen anything from 2 to 10!) on the AVE to get a “PR value”.

So a negative article about your brand would then get an even ten-fold dollar value? KD Paine has every now and then quite entertaining takes on this topic!


Where's The Comment Form?

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: